kalex
May 2, 04:39 PM
1.0.2 version is out
L-U-R-C-H
Apr 20, 04:01 PM
Today's news is really boring...
Anonymous Freak
Aug 13, 10:22 PM
So, unfortunately, my fancy display isn't finished yet, and most of my Macs are in storage at the moment, but here's a video of what I've got at the moment...
The video (http://att.macrumors.com/contest4m/337636.mp4)
Here is my .Mac Gallery link ( http://gallery.mac.com/ehurtley/100023 ). My .Mac Gallery has Tiny, Mobile, and Medium sizes; whereas the version I attempted to upload to MacRumors was a customized 'Mobile' movie. (I lowered the bitrate, and had lower bitrate mono sound compared to a 'standard' Mobile movie to make it fit under 15 MB.)
Thanks for fixing the uploaded version, Doc Q! (So, I tried to upload it 4 or 5 times. Were there a bunch of copies, and I just wasn't getting the URL, or did it not upload at all?)
The video (http://att.macrumors.com/contest4m/337636.mp4)
Here is my .Mac Gallery link ( http://gallery.mac.com/ehurtley/100023 ). My .Mac Gallery has Tiny, Mobile, and Medium sizes; whereas the version I attempted to upload to MacRumors was a customized 'Mobile' movie. (I lowered the bitrate, and had lower bitrate mono sound compared to a 'standard' Mobile movie to make it fit under 15 MB.)
Thanks for fixing the uploaded version, Doc Q! (So, I tried to upload it 4 or 5 times. Were there a bunch of copies, and I just wasn't getting the URL, or did it not upload at all?)
NewEyesOpen
Aug 28, 01:26 PM
There's no reason to run Garageband on a secondary drive, unless of course you're taking a performance hit due to a drive filling up.
But back everything up, multiple copies of .aiff's, .aac's and especially .band's.
Thanks, man. That's definitely what I'm going to do now.
But back everything up, multiple copies of .aiff's, .aac's and especially .band's.
Thanks, man. That's definitely what I'm going to do now.
rjphoto
Mar 11, 05:33 PM
How's it look now... (5:30).
Any other reports from places in town that has them today (or when they will get them)?
Any other reports from places in town that has them today (or when they will get them)?
alejoid
Nov 11, 05:17 PM
http://www.onemorething.nl/uploads/community/a62e74f290a3ddc4abd3a93837f7cddd96ea4cc4_0.jpg
Original pls!
Thanks!
Original pls!
Thanks!
optophobia
Jun 17, 12:19 PM
12am huh.
How about using a #tag for twitter, so others can get an idea of how long the line is in realtime.
Make it Seattle Specific like #SEAIPHONE
How about using a #tag for twitter, so others can get an idea of how long the line is in realtime.
Make it Seattle Specific like #SEAIPHONE
pdjudd
May 5, 11:34 AM
Hmm, FAT32 only allows for 4GB, right?
Individual files can only be 4 gig in size. The partition itself can be much larger
Individual files can only be 4 gig in size. The partition itself can be much larger
littlejim
Oct 12, 04:09 AM
I've tried JetPhoto and it's a dream!
It's has a really nice client on the Mac that integrates with iPhoto and, once set up, gives one click uploading via FTP. The server is a simple PHP script.
It offers some very nice goodies like a flash gallery, a choice of themes and GPS technology integration.
Oh ... and it's free.
http://www.jetphotosoft.com/web/
It's has a really nice client on the Mac that integrates with iPhoto and, once set up, gives one click uploading via FTP. The server is a simple PHP script.
It offers some very nice goodies like a flash gallery, a choice of themes and GPS technology integration.
Oh ... and it's free.
http://www.jetphotosoft.com/web/
Dagless
Jun 17, 11:27 AM
Not sure on US age ratings but Demon's Souls, Oblivion, Fallout 3 are all pretty good.
Mott's
Apr 18, 07:56 PM
The first adapter is what I use to connect to my MB i7 now (i.e., going from Dual-Link to MiniDisplay). Unfortunately, the PC is a laptop with a VGA port (no Dual-Link DVI). So I guess that offers a second option, which using a Dual-Link DVI female to VGA mail adapter. Would that work?
Rister
Oct 24, 09:29 PM
- Have an address bar so I can copy and paste file locations. Really useful to a developer, especially with working between the Finder and Terminal.
Drag-n-drop file/folder in terminal (you can drag icon in title bar too)
- Have a way of seeing how much disk space directories and their children take up, both with number sizes and graphically.
Info window? You won't have the graphical view, though.
Drag-n-drop file/folder in terminal (you can drag icon in title bar too)
- Have a way of seeing how much disk space directories and their children take up, both with number sizes and graphically.
Info window? You won't have the graphical view, though.
MacBytes
Nov 2, 11:24 AM
Category: 3rd Party Software
Link: A9 Toolbar released for Mozilla Firefox (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20041102122406)
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
Link: A9 Toolbar released for Mozilla Firefox (http://www.macbytes.com/link.php?sid=20041102122406)
Posted on MacBytes.com (http://www.macbytes.com)
Approved by Mudbug
eswank
Apr 29, 11:10 AM
I have a Time Machine back up from a White MacBook that I sold. I started fresh when I purchased my Unibody MacBook Pro. My question is... is there anyway I can grab some of those files from the old Time Machine backup and put on my new MacBook Pro? Any advice would help. Thanks!
mongoose78
Mar 5, 04:05 AM
i have a G4, 733mhz. i have no problem capturing the video because i have Final Cut Express. what i can't figure out is how to convert the captured movie into a DVD burnable format so I can watch it on my DVD player. i do have iDVD and iMOVIE. thanks for replying. :cool:
geoldr
Apr 12, 07:54 PM
Link?
I googled the function and clicked the first link and they directed me to this page:
http://simonwoodside.com/weblog/2009/4/22/how_to_really_url_encode/
I have no idea if this is true or not, I have not tried it yet.
EDIT:
I just tried it, and it does work.
I googled the function and clicked the first link and they directed me to this page:
http://simonwoodside.com/weblog/2009/4/22/how_to_really_url_encode/
I have no idea if this is true or not, I have not tried it yet.
EDIT:
I just tried it, and it does work.
apattee
Jun 27, 01:12 PM
what's the model number of the dell monitor?
3007WFP-HC
If you're looking for something else besides that, I'll have to check when I get home from work.
3007WFP-HC
If you're looking for something else besides that, I'll have to check when I get home from work.
superbovine
Nov 13, 06:07 PM
OK, my friend is trying to get me a job doing asp.net and sql server. I was wondering has anybody have had experience with the learning curve involved here. I know my way around LAMP and oracle ok and I am about get my 2003 server mcp so the microsoft world isn't totally foriegn. Also, I have done work in vb6 and mfc/c++, but that was pre .net days. Any thoughts?
ShawtyTiger
Apr 5, 12:53 PM
I have the matte too. I really like it. I haven't noticed any sagging, but I have already broken one of the outer rings taking it out of my pocket. However, I like the option of switching out rings for different color options. As far as protection, I haven't tried the Otterbox, but I've dropped my phone a few times & haven't gotten as much as a scratch.
Hope this helps & good luck.
Hope this helps & good luck.
jxyama
Jul 9, 12:29 PM
you might have had a kernel panic...
i noticed on my pb that the screen went really dim and the instruction to reset the machine was barely visible.
i noticed on my pb that the screen went really dim and the instruction to reset the machine was barely visible.
voicegy
Dec 31, 11:44 AM
Originally posted by iChan
i think while you are redesigning the site, you may as well redesign the logo, that is getting a bit old now...
I'll reserve my critique of the new look and feel of the site after I get used to it for a few days...right off the bat, I concur with a lot of folks regarding the somewhat squished feeling of the middle column and the "busy" factor...but change has a way of growing on people, so perhaps it won't be such a big deal to me later on...it DOES help if one has a cinema display (which I have at work);)
But I've never had a problem with the logo...it's playful, artsy, and somewhat "cheeky"...which, to me, is just right for MacRumors. So, no logo change for at LEAST another year...if ever.:D
i think while you are redesigning the site, you may as well redesign the logo, that is getting a bit old now...
I'll reserve my critique of the new look and feel of the site after I get used to it for a few days...right off the bat, I concur with a lot of folks regarding the somewhat squished feeling of the middle column and the "busy" factor...but change has a way of growing on people, so perhaps it won't be such a big deal to me later on...it DOES help if one has a cinema display (which I have at work);)
But I've never had a problem with the logo...it's playful, artsy, and somewhat "cheeky"...which, to me, is just right for MacRumors. So, no logo change for at LEAST another year...if ever.:D
clintob
Oct 12, 03:05 PM
I don't know maybe because prior to January every consumer machine shipped since about 1990 has come with a consumer productivity suite and maybe I don't apple to lose sales because of sure stupidity. And yes iWork is like MS works. It is not an office suite, it was never meant to be, and it never will be one. It is the replacement for Appleworks. Hence the name iWork instead of Work Pro. Apple is smart enough to realize that it can't beat Microsoft in the office environment.
For the same reason the iLife suite is bundled with every Mac system -- to get people using them, and in the habit of buying the upgrades. I don't understand why Apple thinks this strategy works for iLife but not for iWork. Very short-sighted.
(1) Not even close to every machine ships with a productivity suite... in fact, if you look closely at what you're paying for when you buy most PC machines, those products that "ship standard" with your fancy new PC are built into the price. Most customizable online shops (Dell, et al.) allow you to remove that software and lower the price. So obviously, they are not free.
(2) iWork is undoubtably being groomed as a direct competitor to Office. There's no disputing that. It CURRENTLY is a replacement for AppleWorks, because it's still young and undeveloped in places, but it would be insane for Apple not to try and pursue part of the Office marketshare. It's an untapped resource, and frankly the Office programs are not very well constructed (with the exception of Excel). Outlook, Word, and PowerPoint are pretty lousy, and while Access is solid, it's certainly not leaps and bounds better than (PageMaker) <-- EDIT: Sorry, meant FileMaker.
(3) Bundling software, and then looking for profit on the backend with upgrades is a reasonable answer to the question. There's something to be said for that. But in the end, I think you're comparing Apples and Oranges. While at current, iWork is undeveloped, it is (as I said) being groomed to be a full suite of productivity Apps. iLife is a wonderful package of Apps, but they do not replace Pro Apps. iPhoto is garbage compared to Aperture or Photoshop. Pages is certainly not garbage compared to Word, and Keynote is already a much better App than PowerPoint. So I think there's a flaw in the argument here...
For the same reason the iLife suite is bundled with every Mac system -- to get people using them, and in the habit of buying the upgrades. I don't understand why Apple thinks this strategy works for iLife but not for iWork. Very short-sighted.
(1) Not even close to every machine ships with a productivity suite... in fact, if you look closely at what you're paying for when you buy most PC machines, those products that "ship standard" with your fancy new PC are built into the price. Most customizable online shops (Dell, et al.) allow you to remove that software and lower the price. So obviously, they are not free.
(2) iWork is undoubtably being groomed as a direct competitor to Office. There's no disputing that. It CURRENTLY is a replacement for AppleWorks, because it's still young and undeveloped in places, but it would be insane for Apple not to try and pursue part of the Office marketshare. It's an untapped resource, and frankly the Office programs are not very well constructed (with the exception of Excel). Outlook, Word, and PowerPoint are pretty lousy, and while Access is solid, it's certainly not leaps and bounds better than (PageMaker) <-- EDIT: Sorry, meant FileMaker.
(3) Bundling software, and then looking for profit on the backend with upgrades is a reasonable answer to the question. There's something to be said for that. But in the end, I think you're comparing Apples and Oranges. While at current, iWork is undeveloped, it is (as I said) being groomed to be a full suite of productivity Apps. iLife is a wonderful package of Apps, but they do not replace Pro Apps. iPhoto is garbage compared to Aperture or Photoshop. Pages is certainly not garbage compared to Word, and Keynote is already a much better App than PowerPoint. So I think there's a flaw in the argument here...
maclamb
Nov 10, 08:51 AM
thanks...duh
I already own it and forgot I had it!
I tried it last night and it should work fine ( and I do have a powered antenna)
thanks
I already own it and forgot I had it!
I tried it last night and it should work fine ( and I do have a powered antenna)
thanks
mdriftmeyer
Apr 20, 05:27 PM
Are they going to wait until they have a $100 billion cash stockpile before giving a dividend?
The day they announce a dividend is the day I sell my shares.
The day they announce a dividend is the day I sell my shares.
