Dillenger
Apr 4, 07:43 PM
Add a back lit keyboard and I'll sell my 13 inch MBP and buy one.
satkin2
Apr 5, 04:08 AM
The Airs look really tempting (once Lion comes out, not much point at the moment for me).
However I see comments about it not being great for the 'heavy lifting' jobs. I don't do much processor intensive stuff, but on my '08 MacBook, iPhoto sometimes takes a while and exporting an hours movie from iMovie it can slug quite a bit.
How do the Airs cope with these kind of tasks?
However I see comments about it not being great for the 'heavy lifting' jobs. I don't do much processor intensive stuff, but on my '08 MacBook, iPhoto sometimes takes a while and exporting an hours movie from iMovie it can slug quite a bit.
How do the Airs cope with these kind of tasks?
bibbz
Feb 21, 11:53 AM
http://www.ithinkdiff.com/add-usage-stats-ipod-touch-ipad-settings-app-jailbreak-hack/
I found this online yesterday after using many different apps to not get exactly what I was looking for, this. I'm posting this because I couldn't find it on MR but google had the answer. Maybe this will help someone in the future. :)
I used iFile to make the changes.
Here's a screenshot from my iPad...
http://i56.tinypic.com/2mhj6vt.png
I found this online yesterday after using many different apps to not get exactly what I was looking for, this. I'm posting this because I couldn't find it on MR but google had the answer. Maybe this will help someone in the future. :)
I used iFile to make the changes.
Here's a screenshot from my iPad...
http://i56.tinypic.com/2mhj6vt.png
Aperture
Oct 22, 12:36 PM
All of your ads so far have been hilarious.
Keep up the good work!:)
Kevin
Keep up the good work!:)
Kevin
Heavy Fluid
Oct 9, 12:08 AM
Pick something. Was being built at the time of this pic.
http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q34/lovtrance/closet2.jpg
http://i132.photobucket.com/albums/q34/lovtrance/closet2.jpg
mac4evan
Oct 25, 03:06 PM
That is kind of a silly statement.
What DVD Jon has done is made it possible for OTHER companies to get in on the action and offer content for US, the users of the iPod. I commend him and more importantly I look for other content that is better than 128 kbps and doesn't cost 99 cents per song.
If you want a song with better quality and is less than 99 cents then go somewhere else! Use a Zune with M$'s new online store.
What DVD Jon has done is made it possible for OTHER companies to get in on the action and offer content for US, the users of the iPod. I commend him and more importantly I look for other content that is better than 128 kbps and doesn't cost 99 cents per song.
If you want a song with better quality and is less than 99 cents then go somewhere else! Use a Zune with M$'s new online store.
Paul O'Keefe
Mar 24, 09:31 AM
That screen shot looks good. The interface looks a whole lot better. I'd prefer if it ran as OS X Native, but I might actually give this version a shot.
mintlivedotcom
Apr 24, 07:40 PM
Here's a fixed version for you.
DropBoxed File (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1317651/easter1%20edit.jpg)
While the cameras flash did go off, it couldn't overpower the sun and remove the shadows so I just cloned them out. Hope this helps.
Thanks so much! I owe you big time. Have a great week!
DropBoxed File (http://dl.dropbox.com/u/1317651/easter1%20edit.jpg)
While the cameras flash did go off, it couldn't overpower the sun and remove the shadows so I just cloned them out. Hope this helps.
Thanks so much! I owe you big time. Have a great week!
HawaiiMacAddict
Apr 3, 10:47 PM
Aloha everyone,
I'm not quite sure how this happened, but here's my current issue. I can build, archive, and verify my apps, but after uploading them to iTunes Connect, I get the dreaded "invalid binary" email from Apple. It indicates an invalid signature on the app itself, pointing to the Distribution certificate used.
I then checked out the Organizer in Xcode and everything looked good. I had all the certs listed, as well as the provisioning profiles. I then checked out Keychain access, and this is where it gets a little screwy.
In My Certificates, I can see both the Developer and Distribution certs, both with the private keys. When I check the Keys section, however, all I see is a key for my Developer cert. I don't see a key for my Distribution cert. Does anyone know why this is, or what could have caused this? I'm operating under the assumption, of course, that I need private keys for both certs, and if they show up under My Certificates, then they should also show up under Keys.
I've already sent an email to Apple, but does anyone have a clue as to what I can do between now and when (or if) Apple ever gets back to me?
Thanks in advance for any and all responses.
I'm not quite sure how this happened, but here's my current issue. I can build, archive, and verify my apps, but after uploading them to iTunes Connect, I get the dreaded "invalid binary" email from Apple. It indicates an invalid signature on the app itself, pointing to the Distribution certificate used.
I then checked out the Organizer in Xcode and everything looked good. I had all the certs listed, as well as the provisioning profiles. I then checked out Keychain access, and this is where it gets a little screwy.
In My Certificates, I can see both the Developer and Distribution certs, both with the private keys. When I check the Keys section, however, all I see is a key for my Developer cert. I don't see a key for my Distribution cert. Does anyone know why this is, or what could have caused this? I'm operating under the assumption, of course, that I need private keys for both certs, and if they show up under My Certificates, then they should also show up under Keys.
I've already sent an email to Apple, but does anyone have a clue as to what I can do between now and when (or if) Apple ever gets back to me?
Thanks in advance for any and all responses.
Superdrive
Oct 8, 04:29 PM
Well, hopefully they release the MacMate alongside the iPhone too.
http://guides.macrumors.com/Apple_Domain_Names
http://guides.macrumors.com/Apple_Domain_Names
Maestro64
Oct 4, 11:32 AM
Not trying to shoot down a good idea here, however, I do not see using GSP and Google maps as a mainstream use of Iphoto or some other PDA type application. I do see some very specifice uses where this can be very useful.
However, the technology is to problematic at this point, like I pointed out GPS does not work indoors, and someone pointed out that it could easily assume the nearest location you were at outside before going indoors. This assumes you keep the devices on all the time and not just turn it on when you went indoors. For the most part Cell phone does this, but a camera which most people use to take picture will not be. So all you got is location that camera was last outdoors which could be 100's if miles away.
Some did hit on the idea that might work and is was that website where people posted pictures form cell phone and they were linked to a google map location so people could see points of interest. All this feature allows people to do is have it all done for you verse having to remember where you took the picture and then find the location on google maps and attach it.
However, the technology is to problematic at this point, like I pointed out GPS does not work indoors, and someone pointed out that it could easily assume the nearest location you were at outside before going indoors. This assumes you keep the devices on all the time and not just turn it on when you went indoors. For the most part Cell phone does this, but a camera which most people use to take picture will not be. So all you got is location that camera was last outdoors which could be 100's if miles away.
Some did hit on the idea that might work and is was that website where people posted pictures form cell phone and they were linked to a google map location so people could see points of interest. All this feature allows people to do is have it all done for you verse having to remember where you took the picture and then find the location on google maps and attach it.
Starr
Sep 25, 05:58 AM
Thanx for clearing that up for me, you've just made my life so much easier lol :)
gerror
Jul 16, 06:52 AM
My experience is Xp isn't that slow compared with 98. You just need a lot memory. I have a 700 flatpanel with 768 mb memory. I only run Kazaa and iMesh. (for educational reasons of course ;) )
pdpfilms
Sep 7, 03:12 AM
That procedure looks painful...
belvdr
Dec 3, 04:53 PM
Having Apache running on your computer, and the appropriate ports open on your firewall does theoretically make your computer more vulnerable, but in reality it's definitely not a "sure fire way to get hacked". As long as you take appropriate security measures, like having your firewall set up correctly and turning off things such as Server Signature your chances of getting hacked are quite slim. Apache is what powers a large portion of websites across the world, and if it in itself was that vulnerable websites would go down a lot.
Having a dynamic IP will greatly decrease your chances of getting hacked, as well, because it will change each time your modem gets reset, making your virtually un-findable for any would-be hackers. (Unless you use some sort of DynDNS service that is).
I agree with some parts of what you stated. For starters, if you use Apple's supplied version of Apache (I'm not sure what they currently ship), then you are stuck with that version until they supply any patches for it.
As for ServerSignature, that's fairly useless, as that's considered security by obscurity. You can hide the server you are running, but there are still ways to figure out what server you have.
Also, having a dynamic IP may prevent an individual hacker, but does nothing for bots and worms. Most of the major worms scan entire subnets, so merely having an open port increases your vulnerability.
Having a dynamic IP will greatly decrease your chances of getting hacked, as well, because it will change each time your modem gets reset, making your virtually un-findable for any would-be hackers. (Unless you use some sort of DynDNS service that is).
I agree with some parts of what you stated. For starters, if you use Apple's supplied version of Apache (I'm not sure what they currently ship), then you are stuck with that version until they supply any patches for it.
As for ServerSignature, that's fairly useless, as that's considered security by obscurity. You can hide the server you are running, but there are still ways to figure out what server you have.
Also, having a dynamic IP may prevent an individual hacker, but does nothing for bots and worms. Most of the major worms scan entire subnets, so merely having an open port increases your vulnerability.
tdhurst
Feb 21, 05:15 PM
Awesome thanks I was hoping for it to be cheaper or a free download but ya right it's mac.
Hey I just read the comments, and it says that I need 10.1 can't i just get 10.2 and upgrade from 9.2.2?
Sorry that you can't pirate Mac OSes as easily as some others...You should be able to upgrade directly to 10.2, I did with my 266 G3 running 9.2.2.
Hey I just read the comments, and it says that I need 10.1 can't i just get 10.2 and upgrade from 9.2.2?
Sorry that you can't pirate Mac OSes as easily as some others...You should be able to upgrade directly to 10.2, I did with my 266 G3 running 9.2.2.
kockgunner
Jan 15, 09:13 PM
maybe he forgot :)
SR20DETDOG
Mar 6, 10:08 PM
I wouldn't be able to say how much capacity you need, however, large hard drives are pretty cheap so I'd probably get a bit more than you think you need. Remember there's no need for a fast HDD, maybe something like a WD caviar green?
occamsrazor
Mar 23, 10:27 AM
Witopia is great, servers in many countries, OpenVPN or PPTP (OpenVPN much better, although PPTP works easier on iPhone), good pricing, and awesome support....
http://www.witopia.net/welcome.php
http://www.witopia.net/welcome.php
Chris Bangle
Oct 26, 08:06 AM
I find the interface of this thing more interesting the the button thing... This must be the interface of the future because the menu system on the present ipods, i know its brilliant but its a bit old, by the way its more remote control than ipod, i think theres too much info on the screen for it too be an ipod... i reckon its a media remote control thing.. The patent doenst mention ipod so i think its a remote for bringing music to the living room... im probably wrong but thats what i think.. Anyway ive been waiting for touch screen not touch sides...
Consultant
Apr 20, 04:03 PM
I could easily name 3...
I thought they are too busy shilling for non-apple devices?
I thought they are too busy shilling for non-apple devices?
Queso
Oct 25, 03:52 PM
It's theft disguised as charity...
It's not theft. He's reverse engineered the DRM and is now offering a Fairplay compatible alternative DRM to companies. You may as well say that Apple "stole" Adobe's PDF format when they reverse engineered it into OSX.
It's not theft. He's reverse engineered the DRM and is now offering a Fairplay compatible alternative DRM to companies. You may as well say that Apple "stole" Adobe's PDF format when they reverse engineered it into OSX.
luckystriked
Nov 8, 05:48 PM
http://uppix.net/5/d/e/f42975aa9aab98838ec8a30bd96af.png (http://cl.ly/713c9a1cbea52d0966bf)
wallpaper and dock, please? :D
wallpaper and dock, please? :D
miloblithe
Mar 3, 04:00 PM
...In 2009 the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation gave $3.653 Billion to some of the most important charitable causes around the globe. They're known around the world as one of the most highly selective, efficient, and effective charitable organizations. Is it your position that our federal government would more efficiently/effectively utilize this money?
Actually, it'd be about the same. I base this on the fact that the company I work for, which is a for-profit / non-profit international development company (almost all international development companies have both for- and non- profit arms) receives funding from both USAID and the Gates Foundation. I think it's fairly obvious that we're roughly equally effective at implementing projects from different sources of funding; we're the same company with the same staff on either projects. Of course, Gates rules and USAID rules differ a little in terms of what we have to do with that money, but they're not all that different in the end.
And that's what most of development money goes to in the end: companies (or organizations) that implement projects. The companies and organizations are the same regardless of where the funding comes from.
Actually, it'd be about the same. I base this on the fact that the company I work for, which is a for-profit / non-profit international development company (almost all international development companies have both for- and non- profit arms) receives funding from both USAID and the Gates Foundation. I think it's fairly obvious that we're roughly equally effective at implementing projects from different sources of funding; we're the same company with the same staff on either projects. Of course, Gates rules and USAID rules differ a little in terms of what we have to do with that money, but they're not all that different in the end.
And that's what most of development money goes to in the end: companies (or organizations) that implement projects. The companies and organizations are the same regardless of where the funding comes from.
